India | UK | US

Paulson: GSE risk potential requires new regulator

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Housing finance giants Fannie Mae <FNM.N> and Freddie Mac <FRE.N> have the potential to pose systemic risks to the financial system and need a stronger regulator, U.S. Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson said on Tuesday.
Posted : Tue, 15 Jul 2008 16:05:06 GMT
Author : Reuters
Category : US (Business)
News Alerts by Email ( click here )
US Business News | Home
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Housing finance giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have the potential to pose systemic risks to the financial system and need a stronger regulator, U.S. Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson said on Tuesday.

Paulson, in prepared testimony before the Senate Banking Committee, urged Congress to pass legislation to reform oversight of the two government-sponsored enterprises, with modifications that provide them temporary government backstops for liquidity and equity capital.

"We have long maintained that the GSEs have the potential to pose a systemic risk and worked with Congress on legislation to create a GSE regulator with authorities appropriate to the task and on a par with other financial regulators. We must complete this work," Paulson said.

He said the proposal announced over the weekend to give the Treasury temporary authority to increase the GSES' credit line and purchase their shares if needed "was not prompted by any sudden deterioration in conditions at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac."

Nonetheless, he said, steps were needed to respond to market developments and boost confidence in the two institutions that serve as the core of U.S. housing finance by providing assurances that they have access to liquidity and capital.

Persistent worries about shareholder dilution and the long-term stability of Fannie and Freddie, which provide liquidity to the housing market by buying and securitizing mortgages, have ravaged their stock prices in recent days.

"Given the difficulty in determining the appropriate size of the (GSE) credit line we are not proposing a particular dollar amount, Paulson said. "Flexibility is the best means of increasing market confidence in the GSEs and also the best means of minimizing taxpayer risk."

NO IMMEDIATE FUNDING NEEDS

He stressed, however, that there were no immediate plans by Fannie or Freddie to access the proposed increased Treasury credit line, nor to seek Treasury purchases of its equity.

"If either of these authorities is used, it would be done so only at Treasury's discretion, under terms and conditions that protect the U.S. taxpayer and are agreed by both Treasury and the GSE," Paulson said.

He said he was continuing to encourage the GSES to raise capital and said confidence in the institutions was important to maintaining financial system and market stability.

"Fannie and Freddie play a central role in our housing finance system and must continue to do so in their current form as shareholder owned companies," he said.

(Reporting by David Lawder, Editing by Dan Grebler)


(c) Reuters 2008. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Reuters content, including by caching, framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Reuters. Reuters and the Reuters sphere logo are registered trademarks and trademarks of the Reuters group of companies around the world.

Share/Save/Bookmark

Article : Paulson: GSE risk potential requires new regulator
Print this article
Email this article

Stay Updated
News gadget on your Google homepage
Subscribe to a news feed in Google Reader



Have your Say
Name
Email
Subject
Your Comment

Enter Verification code
 
  

 

 

More US (Business) News click here
Follow The Earth Times
Subscribe to RSS Follow Earth Times on TwitterNews by email
Share/Save/Bookmark

 
 



 
Subscribe to free Earthtimes
News Alerts by Email Click here
For RSS Feeds Click here
or Create your own RSS

Add to Google Toolbar
Breaking News
Press Releases


The Earth Times
News Category

© 2009 www.earthtimes.org, The Earth Times, All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy
Earth Times accept no responsibility or liability either directly or indirectly for views or opinions expressed in articles or comments.