Africa | America | Asia | Australasia | Europe | India | Middle East | UK | US

Britain questions expulsions ahead of Olympic torch relay

Posted : Thu, 01 May 2008 02:27:03 GMT
Author : DPA
Category : Asia (World)
News Alerts by Email ( click here )
Asia World News | Home
Hong Kong - British officials in Hong Kong were Thursday preparing to meet a Hong Kong government minister to ask why two Britons planning to take part in anti-China protests during the Olympic torch relay on May 2 were refused entry. British consul-general Andrew Seaton is due to meet Secretary for Security Ambrose Lee Friday afternoon to ask why Free Tibet Campaign spokesman Matt Whitticase and another unnamed Briton were detained at the airport on Tuesday.

A British consulate spokesman told Thursday's South China Morning Post that Seaton wanted to "seek clarification" over why the two Britons were refused entry to the former British colony.

European Union representatives are expected to join in the meeting between Seaton and Lee, the newspaper said, following the refusal to allow protesters from other European countries into Hong Kong in recent days.

Whitticase has returned to London and was due to give a press conference over the internet on the situation in Tibet later Thursday while the unnamed Briton was still being detained in Hong Kong and receiving medical treatment for high blood pressure.

The Britons are among a number of foreigners refused entry to Hong Kong ahead of Friday's torch relay, which will be the first appearance of the Olympic flame on Chinese soil after its troubled round-the-world tour.

On Saturday, Danish sculptor and human rights activist Jens Galschiot and his two sons were also denied entry to Hong Kong and sent on a plane back to Europe by immigration officials.

Hong Kong guarantees the freedom to protest under its 'one country, two systems' arrangement with Beijing which gives people more political freedom than in the rest of China.

However, the Hong Kong government appears anxious to ensure that protests like those seen in London and Paris do not disrupt the Olympic torch during its 30-kilometre relay through the city on Friday.

Immigration officials have refused to comment on any of the cases so far, insisting it will not comment on individual cases, but have said in statements they must "uphold effective immigration control so as to ensure Hong Kong's public interest."

US actress Mia Farrow, who has criticized China over its links with the Sudan, was due to arrive in Hong Kong later Thursday. The Hong Kong government has refused to say whether or not she will be allowed in.

Copyright, respective author or news agency

Share/Save/Bookmark

Article : Britain questions expulsions ahead of Olympic torch relay
Print this article
Email this article

Stay Updated
News gadget on your Google homepage
Subscribe to a news feed in Google Reader



Have your Say
Name
Email
Subject
Your Comment

Enter Verification code
 
  

 

 
Your Comments

pro-tibetan violent protest is not welcome
By: han , Thu, 01 May 2008 17:11:38 GMT

Lahsa rioting may be fabricated by Chinese government, but London,Paris pro-tibetan protests were not peaceful at all. Facts speak volume.No government likes violence. Why do British diplomats pretend to be so ignorant of protesters violent behaviour?


Comments
By: Michael , Thu, 01 May 2008 03:09:47 GMT

The Britains don't want to come to the Olympics anyway so now they want to come into China? How much brains do you need to figure out why Tibetian protestors who are trying to sabatoge the Torch run are being denied entry!!!



More Asia (World) News click here
Follow The Earth Times
Subscribe to RSS Follow Earth Times on TwitterNews by email
Share/Save/Bookmark

 
 



 
Subscribe to free Earthtimes
News Alerts by Email Click here
For RSS Feeds Click here
or Create your own RSS

Add to Google Toolbar
Breaking News
Press Releases


The Earth Times
News Category

© 2009 www.earthtimes.org, The Earth Times, All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy
Earth Times accept no responsibility or liability either directly or indirectly for views or opinions expressed in articles or comments.