Africa | America | Asia | Australasia | Europe | India | Middle East | UK | US

Parents of Diana' driver defend their son

Posted : Wed, 06 Feb 2008 03:41:51 GMT
Author : World News Editor
Category : World
News Alerts by Email ( click here )
World News | Home
LONDON, Feb. 5 The parents of Henri Paul, the driver of the car in which British Princess Diana died in Paris in 1997, denied claims their son was a heavy drinker.

Testifying at a London hearing into Diana's death Monday through a video link from Paris, Jean and Giselle Paul said they had never seen their son drunk and said French police refused their request for an independent blood test, The Times of London reported.

The elderly couple said Henri Paul had passed a medical examination to maintain his private pilot's license three days before the car he was driving crashed into a Paris underpass.

The couple also denied accusations by Mohamed Al Fayed, the father of Diana's lover, Dodi Fayed, who also died in the crash, that Paul had been paid by British security services. They said their son received as much as $15,000 a month in tips from wealthy guests at the Ritz Hotel in Paris.

The inquest previously heard accusations that French police planted alcohol in Paul's apartment after the crash, the newspaper said.

Copyright 2008 by UPI

Share/Save/Bookmark

Article : Parents of Diana' driver defend their son
Print this article
Email this article

Stay Updated
News gadget on your Google homepage
Subscribe to a news feed in Google Reader



Have your Say
Name
Email
Subject
Your Comment

Enter Verification code
 
  

 

 

More World News click here
Follow The Earth Times
Subscribe to RSS Follow Earth Times on TwitterNews by email
Share/Save/Bookmark

 
 



 
Subscribe to free Earthtimes
News Alerts by Email Click here
For RSS Feeds Click here
or Create your own RSS

Add to Google Toolbar
Breaking News
Press Releases


The Earth Times
News Category

© 2009 www.earthtimes.org, The Earth Times, All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy
Earth Times accept no responsibility or liability either directly or indirectly for views or opinions expressed in articles or comments.