Games | Internet | Science | Space

Neutron stars: More massive than thought

Posted : Tue, 15 Jan 2008 16:57:17 GMT
Author : Science News Editor
Category : Science (Technology)
News Alerts by Email ( click here )
Science Technology News | Home
ARECIBO, Puerto Rico, Jan. 15 Astronomers at the Arecibo Observatory in Puerto Rico have discovered neutron stars can be much more massive than previously believed.

"The matter at the center of a neutron star is highly incompressible. Our new measurements of the mass of neutron stars will help nuclear physicists understand the properties of super-dense matter," said astronomer Paulo Freire. "It also means that to form a black hole, more mass is needed than previously thought. Thus, in our universe, black holes might be more rare and neutron stars slightly more abundant."

Astronomers had thought neutron stars needed between 1.6 and 2.5 times the mass of the sun in order to collapse and become black holes. However, the new research shows neutron stars remain neutron stars between the mass of 1.9 and up to possibly 2.7 suns.

Freire presented the research last week in Austin, Texas, during the national meeting of the American Astronomical Society.

The Arecibo Observatory is managed by Cornell University for the National Science Foundation.

Copyright 2008 by UPI

Share/Save/Bookmark

Article : Neutron stars: More massive than thought
Print this article
Email this article

Stay Updated
News gadget on your Google homepage
Subscribe to a news feed in Google Reader



Have your Say
Name
Email
Subject
Your Comment

Enter Verification code
 
  

 

 

More Science (Technology) News click here
Follow The Earth Times
Subscribe to RSS Follow Earth Times on TwitterNews by email
Share/Save/Bookmark

 
 



 
Subscribe to free Earthtimes
News Alerts by Email Click here
For RSS Feeds Click here
or Create your own RSS

Add to Google Toolbar
Breaking News
Press Releases


The Earth Times
News Category

© 2009 www.earthtimes.org, The Earth Times, All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy
Earth Times accept no responsibility or liability either directly or indirectly for views or opinions expressed in articles or comments.