Africa | America | Asia | Australasia | Europe | India | Middle East | UK | US

US considering covert push within Pakistan: NYT

Posted : Sun, 06 Jan 2008 11:20:00 GMT
Author : IANS
Category : Asia (World)
News Alerts by Email ( click here )
Asia World News | Home
New York, Jan 6 - In response to intelligence reports that Al Qaeda and Taliban are intensifying efforts to destabilise the Pakistan government, the US is considering conducting aggressive covert operations in the country's tribal areas.

Vice-President Dick Cheney, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and President George W. Bush's senior national security advisers met Friday at the White House to debate expanding the authority of the CIA and the military for the purpose, The New York Times reported.

Many of the specific options under discussion are unclear and highly classified and would probably involve the CIA working with the military's Special Operations forces to strike selected targets in Pakistan, in some cases using intelligence provided by Pakistani sources, US administration officials told the newspaper.

Many participants in the meeting, convened to discuss US strategy post-Benazir Bhutto assassination, argued that the threat to the government of President Pervez Musharraf was now so grave that both him and Pakistan's new military leadership were likely to give the US more latitude, the Times said in its report Sunday.

'After years of focusing on Afghanistan, we think the extremists now see a chance for the big prize - creating chaos in Pakistan itself,' one senior official said.

The US currently has about 50 soldiers in Pakistan. Any expanded operations using CIA operatives or Special Operations forces, like the Navy Seals, would be small and tailored to specific missions, military officials told the Times.

In the past, the US has stayed out of the tribal areas, in part for fear that exposure of any American-led operations there would so embarrass the Musharraf government that it could further empower his critics, who consider him too close to Washington.

Even now, officials told the newspaper, some in the State Department argue that American-led military operations on the Pakistani side of the border with Afghanistan could result in a tremendous backlash and ultimately do more harm than good.

In part, the White House discussions may be driven by a desire for another effort to capture or kill Osama bin Laden and his deputy. Ayman al-Zawahri.

Currently, CIA operatives and Special Operations forces have limited authority to conduct counter-terrorism missions in Pakistan based on specific intelligence about the whereabouts of those two men, who have eluded the Bush administration for more than six years.

The meeting Friday, which was not publicly announced, was attended by Stephen J. Hadley, Bush's national security adviser, Adm. Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and top intelligence officials, the Times reported.

Although some officials and experts have criticised Musharraf and questioned his ability to take on extremists, Bush has remained steadfast in his support, and it is unlikely any new measures, including direct American military action inside Pakistan, will be approved without Musharraf's consent, the newspaper said.


(c) Indo-Asian News Service

Share/Save/Bookmark

Article : US considering covert push within Pakistan: NYT
Print this article
Email this article

Stay Updated
News gadget on your Google homepage
Subscribe to a news feed in Google Reader



Have your Say
Name
Email
Subject
Your Comment

Enter Verification code
 
  

 

 

More Asia (World) News click here
Follow The Earth Times
Subscribe to RSS Follow Earth Times on TwitterNews by email
Share/Save/Bookmark

 
 



 
Subscribe to free Earthtimes
News Alerts by Email Click here
For RSS Feeds Click here
or Create your own RSS

Add to Google Toolbar
Breaking News
Press Releases


The Earth Times
News Category

© 2009 www.earthtimes.org, The Earth Times, All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy
Earth Times accept no responsibility or liability either directly or indirectly for views or opinions expressed in articles or comments.