Africa | America | Asia | Australasia | Europe | India | Middle East | UK | US

US stops military supplies to Sri Lanka after truce abrogation

Posted : Fri, 04 Jan 2008 05:09:01 GMT
Author : P.K. Balachandran
Category : US (World)
News Alerts by Email ( click here )
US World News | Home
Colombo, Jan 4 - The US has stopped the supply of military equipment and services to Sri Lanka, as key countries rapped the Mahinda Rajapaksa government for unilaterally abrogating the 2002 Norway-brokered truce with the Tamil Tiger rebels.

A US government website said the country has suspended the issuance of licences for the sale or transfer of military equipment and services to Sri Lanka with effect from Dec 26, 2007, as per the Department of State Foreign Operations and Related Programmes Appropriation Act.

The Sri Lankan government had Wednesday decided to withdraw from the ceasefire agreement it had signed with the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) citing its failure to bring peace to the country.

'It is the policy of the United States to deny applications for licences and other approvals to export or otherwise transfer defence articles or services to Sri Lanka,' a communique issued Thursday by the US State Department Directorate of Defence Trade Controls said.

However, it added that licences might be granted 'on a case by case basis' for the transfer of technical data or equipment for the limited purposes of maritime and air surveillance and communications.

A $500 billion appropriation bill passed by the US Congress late last year had said that before any military supplies were made to Sri Lanka, the secretary of state should certify that the Sri Lankan government had improved its human rights record in certain specific areas.

Listing the conditions, Congress had said the Sri Lankan government would have to show that it had prosecuted military personnel who had helped the recruitment of child soldiers or committed extra-judicial killings.

The island's government would also have to show that it had provided humanitarian groups and journalists access to the Tamil areas of the country.

International human rights organisations and the UN had consistently complained that some Sri Lankan armed forces personnel, fighting against Tamil Tiger rebels, were 'complicit' in the recruitment of children by the pro-government Tamil armed group led by Karuna in the eastern district of Batticaloa.

Human rights groups had charged that army personnel had killed 17 workers of the French aid agency Action Against Hunger in Mutur in 2006. The 'execution style' killing of 16 young Tamil men and women and one Muslim had attracted worldwide condemnation.

Recently, the Millennium Challenge Corporation, a US government company, had de-listed Sri Lanka from its 2008 funding list, in a move that was interpreted as a censure of this country for its failure to make meaningful efforts to restore peace in a land torn by a long drawn out war with the separatist LTTE.

The US State Department said Thursday that it was 'troubled' by the Sri Lankan government's abrogation of the truce pact.


(c) Indo-Asian News Service

Share/Save/Bookmark

Article : US stops military supplies to Sri Lanka after truce abrogation
Print this article
Email this article

Stay Updated
News gadget on your Google homepage
Subscribe to a news feed in Google Reader



Have your Say
Name
Email
Subject
Your Comment

Enter Verification code
 
  

 

 
Your Comments

Misleading title and content
By: Saman Silava , Fri, 04 Jan 2008 14:28:38 GMT

The title and the text of this news article is completely misleading. This gives the impression that the US government stopped the military supplies "due to" the cancellation of CFA by the government of Sri Lanka. The truth is the US government has taken that decision way before the announcement of the cancellation of CFA, and it just came into effect lately. If the writer had given the dates when this was approved by US Congress, when it was signed by President Bush and when it came into effect, the readers could have got a clear picture.



how can this be?
By: peace 4 all , Fri, 04 Jan 2008 07:21:33 GMT

us stopped military deals with effect from Dec 26, 2007, while
Sri lanka decides to end the ceasefire on 3rd january 2008.

So the headline "US stops military supplies to Sri Lanka after truce abrogation" is incorrect.

Would you please correct it, for the sake of "TRUTH".

I'm sure the headline was changed to be more "attractive", but it makes the whole article "meaningless".

It also doesn't mention about the devolution package the Govt. of sri lanka is offering to the moderate Tamil parties, before the arrival of Mr. Manmohan Singh who is more relevant a news than the 2 years old stories of violence such as muttur incidence that western media seems to be still repeating. (because there's not enough cachy news recently?)

Thank you


Re: ABC(DE) Countries
By: Sam. Ratnam , Fri, 04 Jan 2008 06:57:23 GMT

This is just a symbolic value rather than the futile policies of the NATO and the ABC(DE)NATO countries. They are under pressure of the Chinese growth in this region and the Unconditional Chinese Militory support for Srilanka for decades.
Objectively this is the reflection of Bush regime's (Sam and Bob o' Blake)stirle war on terror policy which gave Srilankan regime an unconditional support. Subjectively it is a bad failure for the moderate Muslims and Citizens of the World who are denied liberty, right to live and exist.


sri lankan president
By: roy , Fri, 04 Jan 2008 05:54:51 GMT

The US GOVT should revoke the citizenship of sri lankan president's brothers namely Gotabya and Basil Rajapakse.



More US (World) News click here
Follow The Earth Times
Subscribe to RSS Follow Earth Times on TwitterNews by email
Share/Save/Bookmark

 
 



 
Subscribe to free Earthtimes
News Alerts by Email Click here
For RSS Feeds Click here
or Create your own RSS

Add to Google Toolbar
Breaking News
Press Releases


The Earth Times
News Category

© 2009 www.earthtimes.org, The Earth Times, All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy
Earth Times accept no responsibility or liability either directly or indirectly for views or opinions expressed in articles or comments.