Africa | America | Asia | Australasia | Europe | India | Middle East | UK | US

Khatami stages political comeback ahead of March polls - Feature

Posted : Thu, 20 Dec 2007 10:47:05 GMT
By : DPA
Category : Middle East (World)
News Alerts by Email ( click here )
Middle East World News | Home
Tabriz, Iran - For more than two years he has remained on the political sidelines, quietly observing the actions of his successor Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. But now former Iranian president Mohammad Khatami has broken his silence, returning to the political stage at the head of a reformist alliance challenging Ahmadinejad in parliamentary elections scheduled for March 14.

Khatami's comeback was officially launched in the western Iranian city of Tabriz, capital of East Azerbaijan province. As during his tenure as president between 1997 and 2005, posters of the cleric were again plastered on walls of the city, Iran's fourth-largest.

"He was invited by the East Azerbaijan reformist groups - but this is de facto part of our election campaign," Mohammad-Ali Abtahi, former vice-president and current spokesman for Khatami, said in Tabriz.

Khatami, ex-president Akbar Hashemi-Rafsanjani and former parliamentary speaker Mehdi Karrubi are considered by reformists as the central triangle of the opposition, although Karrubi's Etemad Melli (National Trust) party plans to run independently in the March elections.

"Of course we have this triangle but Khatami is the force behind the power - nothing works without him," said Karim Abedi, the head of the Azerbaijan office of the leading reformist Iran Islamic Participation Front (IIPF) party.

Abedi added that Khatami was the only person capable of uniting the different opposition groups to enable them stand against Ahmadinejad and his faction.

It came as no surprise, therefore, when the 64-year-old cleric was unanimously elected by the new reformist coalition group as its leader to run against the pro-Ahmadinejad wing.

In Tabriz, Khatami attended a two-hour session with the Azeri reformist groups and patiently listened to their questions, proposals, complaints and especially their fear that like before the 2004 parliamentary elections, a significant number of reformist candidates would once again be disqualified by the Guardian Council.

The Guardian Council, an ultraconservative senate-like body constitutionally in charge of approving or rejecting candidates for parliamentary and presidential elections, disqualified more than 2,500 reformist candidates for the 2004 elections without giving any reasons.

The disqualifications led to a low turnout - in the capital Tehran less than 28 per cent - and the pro-Ahmadinejad Abadgaran (Development Builders) party eventually won the elections.

"There should be trust and respect for people's decisions and votes and no official body should consider itself entitled to decide on people's behalf," Khatami said in Tabriz, earning himself a standing ovation from the 300 reformist activists present.

However Khatami warned that the reformists should be prepared for a worst-case scenario, adding that even if many candidates are again rejected, there would be more to take their place.

Boycotting the elections in protest would achieve nothing for the reformist movement, he said, as none of its aims could be realised while in opposition.

"We should break the global prejudice and show the world that Islam and democracy are compatible - although some give the impression that they are not," he said, referring to Ahmadinejad.

Iran's international image improved considerably during Khatami's eight-year presidential tenure, when the Islamic state employed various initiatives in an effort to open its gates to the West.

Reformists accuse Ahmadinejad of having tarnished Iran's reputation abroad and of having isolated the country, not only through its contentious nuclear programme but also through the president's Holocaust denials and statements advocating the eradication of Israel.

"We are very worried about the future of our country," Khatami said.

"We should therefore all work together to remove (Western) threats and instead attract new opportunities for cooperation."

Copyright DPA

Share/Save/Bookmark

Article : Khatami stages political comeback ahead of March polls - Feature
Print this article
Email this article

Stay Updated
News gadget on your Google homepage
Subscribe to a news feed in Google Reader


Related News



Have your Say
Name
Email
Subject
Your Comment

Enter Verification code
 
  


 
Your Comments

War threats
By: Johan Edmondson , Fri, 21 Dec 2007 09:57:45 GMT

These were constant US and Israeli threats that caused the demise of the reformists and the appearance of Ahmadinejad. Also today's constant war threats by Bushites and Israel even after the NIE report is strengthening the hardliners in Iran. Iranians have come to believe that Bushites cooked the intelligence on Iraq because the aim of that war was taking control of the Middle East resources and not removing the threat of nonexistent WMD threats. That aim is still US's position and Iran is unfairly targeted because it doesn't submit to the wishes of American empire. Iran is depicted as a threat whereas it is the US that has military camps in every single country surrounding it and not vice versa. Iran's military expenditures, according to Newsweek, are as much as that of the tiny Finland and much less than its neighbours. However its legitimate defensive security measures are depicted as a threat.That is pure nonsense propaganda aiming at softening the Western public for waging a new illegitimate war.



More Middle East (World) News click here
Follow The Earth Times
Subscribe to RSS Follow Earth Times on TwitterNews by email
Share/Save/Bookmark

 
 



 
Subscribe to free Earthtimes
News Alerts by Email Click here
For RSS Feeds Click here
or Create your own RSS

Add to Google Toolbar
Breaking News
Press Releases

 

 

The Earth Times
News Category

© 2010 www.earthtimes.org, The Earth Times, All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy
Earth Times accept no responsibility or liability either directly or indirectly for views or opinions expressed in articles or comments.