The Earthtimes online News
Home


Ministerial talks begin to hammer out 'Bali roadmap'

Posted : Wed, 12 Dec 2007 04:03:01 GMT
Author : DPA
Category : Asia (World)
News Alerts by Email click here )
Create your own RSS
Asia World News | Home
Bali Island, Indonesia - Environment ministers from around the world started talks Wednesday at a UN climate conference to reach a mandate for negotiations for a new global convention to protect the climate. The ministers' aims are to hammer out a roadmap for a pact to succeed the Kyoto Protocol when it expires in 2012. The Kyoto pact, signed in 1997, took effect on February 16, 2005, after gruelling negotiations to complete its rulebook on curbing greenhouse-gas emissions.

However, in its present form, it will not do enough to stem the surge in pollution, which scientists say is badly damaging the Earth's climate system.

The UN climate conference of 190 countries is seeking a roadmap to set the parameters for further negotiations leading to a new accord to accelerate cuts in greenhouse-gas emissions after 2012, when the protocol's current roster of pledges runs out.

Talks on the Bali roadmap are struggling on key questions on how extensive the post-2012 negotiation mandate should be and whether the negotiations should be set to a two-year deadline to conclude.

International environmental group World Wild Fund for Nature (WWF) called on the ministers to agree to a blueprint for negotiations.

"More droughts, powerful storms, floods and rising sea levels are among the risks associated with a warming planet," said Hans Verolme, director of WWF's Global Climate Change Programme.

"Bali is a leadership moment, for years the climate talks moved at a snail's pace, ministers now need to take charge. Canada, Japan, and the US have been dragging their heels here in Bali, they need to remember that all the world is asking for is for all countries to do their fair share; nothing more, but also nothing less," Verolme said.

The environment ministers in Bali have a draft agreement that sets up an emissions goal and the first-ever attempt to recognize national actions to reduce emissions in developing countries.

The document calls for nations that signed the emissions-limiting Kyoto Protocol to agree to a total target for reductions in greenhouse-gas emissions after the existing treaty expires in 2012, and decide how each country can individually contribute to that goal.

The Kyoto pact agreed on exactly 10 years ago, requires 36 industrial countries to reduce carbon dioxide and other industrial, transportation and agricultural gases blamed for global warming by an average 5 per cent below 1990 levels in the next five years.

The United States is the only major industrial country not to ratify the Kyoto Protocol. President George W Bush contended the emission cuts would harm the US economy, and should have been imposed on China, India and other fast-growing developing economies.

The rest of the world hopes to enlist the US in the next, post-Kyoto phase of internationally binding greenhouse-gas reductions. The change in US administration after next November's presidential election is expected to introduce a new attitude on climate change.

In their first significant agreement, participants at the talks on the Indonesian island of Bali agreed to implement a climate change adaptation fund, which would help developing nations adapt to the adverse effects of climate change, such as drought, floods and crop failures.

Under the agreement, disbursements would begin from the fund, which was a key part of the 1997 Kyoto Protocol, the world's first treaty that mandates cuts in greenhouse gas emissions.

About 67 million dollars has accumulated in the fund, which is financed by a 2-per-cent levy on transactions under the Clean Development Mechanism, whereby rich countries receive carbon credits, which helps them meet their targets to cut greenhouse gas emissions, provided they invest in clean-energy projects in poor countries.

The fund is to be administered by the Global Environment Facility, which donor governments established 16 years ago to fund conservation projects. The World Bank is to act as its trustee, and a 16-member board, drawn from rich and poor Kyoto signatories, is to oversee it.

Despite the progress at the negotiations, the lead author of a study commissioned by the United Nations warned that much more money is needed to help poor countries deal with the effects of climate change.

Copyright, respective author or news agency



Article : Ministerial talks begin to hammer out 'Bali roadmap'
Print this article
Email this article


Share on

Have your Say
Name
Email
Subject
Your Comment

Enter Verification code
 
  

 

 
Your Comments

Please fact check!!!
By: Colby Hamilton , Thu, 13 Dec 2007 02:12:44 GMT

According to your article, the Kyoto pact was agreed on 10 years ago, but in the next sentence you state" The United States is the only major industrial country not to ratify the Kyoto Protocol. President George W Bush contended the emission cuts would harm the US economy"

President Bush was still 4 years away from being President in 1997. I doubt President Bush had much to say about it in 1997 or if anyone cared what he said back then.

Please correct your article as to why and how the US Government came to reject the pact. Your story is not honest journalism.


Santa Claus
By: Anga2010 , Thu, 13 Dec 2007 01:53:50 GMT

Actually, 650 years ago Santa Claus decided against the earlier so-called "Kyoto 1458 accord" on account of it having a negative effect on his domecile. Called the "Santa NIMBY" proclomation, it prohibited the banning of the burning of wood and coal in his domain.


full truthfulness
By: lefty , Thu, 13 Dec 2007 00:54:59 GMT

We've been over this whole thing before, and more than once: "On July 25, 1997, before the Kyoto Protocol was finalized (although it had been fully negotiated, and a penultimate draft was finished), the U.S. Senate unanimously passed by a 95–0 vote the Byrd-Hagel Resolution (S. Res. 98),[40] which stated the sense of the Senate was that the United States should not be a signatory to any protocol that did not include binding targets and timetables for developing as well as industrialized nations or "would result in serious harm to the economy of the United States". On November 12, 1998, Vice President Al Gore symbolically signed the protocol. Both Gore and Senator Joseph Lieberman indicated that the protocol would not be acted upon in the Senate until there was participation by the developing nations.[41] The Clinton Administration never submitted the protocol to the Senate for ratification."



US rejection
By: Terry , Wed, 12 Dec 2007 17:52:41 GMT

The treaty was never presented to the US senate. The senate, by a vote of 95-0, passed a resolution rejecting the treaty, so Clinton never presented it to the senate. Why do you imply that Bush rejected the treaty when he didn't?


Get your facts right
By: rightwingprof , Wed, 12 Dec 2007 16:51:03 GMT

Pres. Bush had nothing to do with Kyoto, which was unanimously rejected by the Senate during Clinton's presidency.


10 years ago
By: Tom , Wed, 12 Dec 2007 13:09:04 GMT

"Bush contended the emission cuts would harm the US economy"

Bush was President 10 years ago?

Al Gore actually signed the Senate resolution rejecting Kyoto for the US.



More Asia (World) News click here

Choose Theme
Green Earth Blue Earth Orange Earth Purple Earth

Search
 
You can
Print this articleemail this articleComment on this article

Current News

News Category
Business
Entertainment
Environment
General
Health
Sports
Technology
World
- Africa
- America
- Asia
- Australasia
- Europe
- India
- Middle East
- UK
- US
Press Release

About us | News Archives | Browse old Archive | Feedback | Disclaimer | Mobile/PDA | News Alerts

The views expressed in the articles are not necessarily those of earthtimes.org and we accept no responsibility for the views or opinions
expressed in the articles either direct or indirect.

© 2008 www.earthtimes.org, The Earth Times, All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy