Africa | America | Asia | Australasia | Europe | India | Middle East | UK | US

Court rules no right to divorce counsel

Posted : Fri, 07 Dec 2007 00:32:42 GMT
By : General News Editor
Category : US (World)
News Alerts by Email ( click here )
US World News | Home
OLYMPIA, Wash., Dec. 6 The Washington state Supreme Court Thursday rejected a woman's claim she had a right to an attorney appointed at public expense in her divorce case.

The high court ruled 7-2 that a woman's constitutional rights were not violated when she was unable to convince a judge without the help of an attorney to give her custody of her children, The Seattle Post-Intelligencer reported.

Writing for the majority, Justice Charles Johnson said that although the state Legislature could consider changing the law, divorces are civil matters that do not warrant state-funded counsel.

The case was brought forth by Brenda King, who was divorcing her husband of 10 years, Michael, in Snohomish County Superior Court in 2004, the newspaper reported Thursday.

He had a lawyer. She hired one with her rent money but then couldn't afford to make subsequent payments, so she argued her own case in which her husband was ultimately awarded custody of their children.

Copyright 2007 by UPI

Share/Save/Bookmark

Article : Court rules no right to divorce counsel
Print this article
Email this article

Stay Updated
News gadget on your Google homepage
Subscribe to a news feed in Google Reader


Related News



Have your Say
Name
Email
Subject
Your Comment

Enter Verification code
 
  


 

More US (World) News click here
Follow The Earth Times
Subscribe to RSS Follow Earth Times on TwitterNews by email
Share/Save/Bookmark

 
 



 
Subscribe to free Earthtimes
News Alerts by Email Click here
For RSS Feeds Click here
or Create your own RSS

Add to Google Toolbar
Breaking News
Press Releases

 

 

The Earth Times
News Category

© 2010 www.earthtimes.org, The Earth Times, All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy
Earth Times accept no responsibility or liability either directly or indirectly for views or opinions expressed in articles or comments.