Africa | America | Asia | Australasia | Europe | India | Middle East | UK | US

Oxford students disrupt David Irving debate - Summary

Posted : Mon, 26 Nov 2007 22:26:04 GMT
By : DPA
Category : UK (World)
News Alerts by Email ( click here )
UK World News | Home
London - Angry student demonstrators forced their way Monday into an Oxford Union debating hall, disrupting an event at which the controversial historian David Irving was due to speak. Irving, who is British, has repeatedly denied the Holocaust and served a prison term in Austria for the offence.

Police said that a group of about 30 students were staging a sit- in inside the debating hall of the renowned Oxford Union, which is attached to Oxford University.

A hard core of some 30 protestors, singing and chanting anti- fascist slogans, stopped the debate from getting under way, reports said.

They had broken away from up to 500 protestors and scaled a wall to force their way into the building, shouting "shame on you" and "fascists out."

Irving and Nick Griffin, leader of Britain's racist British National Party (BNP), had arrived hours before the evening event to be escorted into the building.

They were due to take part in a debate on free speech.

Martin McCluskey from the Oxford University Students' Union said that giving Irving and Griffin a platform would be to give them "legitimacy and credibility."

"It is as if we are saying, we agree with what they are saying," he said.

But Anne Atkins, a British writer and broadcaster who was participating in the event, said it was wrong to silence those espousing controversial views.

While she was not agreeing with the two men's views, it was "dangerous and disturbing" to believe that the "majority is always right."

Despite opposition from the Oxford Student Union and the university's Muslim and Jewish societies, Oxford Union members voted by a margin of 2 to 1 to let the ticket-only event, entitled Free Speech Forum, go ahead.

The Union is well-known for hosting high-profile foreign speakers, including Henry Kissinger, Mother Teresa, Benazir Bhutto and the Dalai Lama.

In Britain, a string of politicians including Defence Secretary Des Browne and Labour politician Chris Bryant pulled out of the event after learning that they would have to share a platform with Irving and Griffin.

Julian Lewis, a Conservative member of parliament, resigned from the Union in protest.

Luke Tryl, president of the Oxford Union, said: "The men were not being given a platform to extol their views but were coming to talk about the limits of free speech."

Denis McShane, former Europe minister in the British Foreign Office, last week pulled out of an Oxford Union event after objecting to plans for "two notorious anti-Semites to be given a platform."

"To put four-star Jew-haters onto a prestigious platform like the Oxford Union is to validate modern anti-Semitism," said McShane.

Irving was sentenced in Austria in February 2006 to three years in prison for Holocaust denial but was released early in December of the same year.

Griffin has been convicted of incitement to racial hatred and denying the Holocaust.

"There is no place for racists and fascists at universities," said Yair Sivan of the Union of Jewish Students at Oxford.

Hafia Hassan, a 19-year-old French and Spanish student, who had come to listen to the debate, said: "I think we are intelligent enough to oppose these people."

Copyright DPA

Share/Save/Bookmark

Article : Oxford students disrupt David Irving debate - Summary
Print this article
Email this article

Stay Updated
News gadget on your Google homepage
Subscribe to a news feed in Google Reader


Related News

Britain launches hearings to find 'truth' about Iraq war - Summary
London - A far-reaching public inquiry into the political and military decisions that led Britain to take part in the 2003 invasion of Iraq opened in London Tuesday. On its first day of public hearings, the inquiry heard evidence from a string of for...

'Cruel Britannia' report claims torture link with Pakistan - Summary
London - A human rights group Tuesday accused the British government of complicity in the torture of five British nationals held by the security agencies of Pakistan between 2004 and 2007. The organization Human Rights Watch (HRW) said in London that...

Whitewash or catharsis? Britain launches Iraq war probe - Feature
London- A public inquiry televised into every home was launched Tuesday in Britain, promising to expose the truth about why the country stood shoulder to shoulder with the US in the invasion of Iraq six years ago. The Chilcot inquiry, so-named af...

Report says Britain and Pakistan colluded in 'torture' of suspects
London - A human rights group Tuesday accused the British government of complicity in the torture of five British nationals held by the security agencies of Pakistan between 2004 and 2007. The organization Human Rights Watch (HRW) said in London that...

Britain launches hearings to find 'truth' about Iraq war
London- A far-reaching public inquiry into the political and military decisions that led to the 2003 invasion of Iraq opened in Britain Tuesday. The inquiry will hear evidence from a range of politicians and military leaders, including former prime m...

Charles de Menezes family accept compensation from British police
London - The family of a Brazilian man shot dead by British police who mistook him for a terrorist agreed Monday to a compensation deal which they said would draw a final line under the tragic affair. Relatives of Jean Charles de Menezes have been lo...

US-British alliance in Iraq marked by tension, says report
London- The tense relationship between US and British commanders following the 2003 invasion of Iraq was highlighted in British media reports Monday ahead of public hearings in a far- reaching inquiry into the war. The Daily Telegraph newspaper, citi...

Have your Say
Name
Email
Subject
Your Comment

Enter Verification code
 
  

 

 
Your Comments

'I believe in free speech, but...'
By: Robert , Mon, 26 Nov 2007 22:31:59 GMT

Saying you ‘believe in free speech, but...’ is meaningless, just as saying ‘I’m not racist, but...’. Either we are free to say and think what we believe or we are not. Liberals should be inside the room arguing with them and proving them wrong, not just protesting pointlessly outside or childishly sitting at the debating table and disrupting the debate. You can’t win the arguments if you don’t fight the battles. Banning things just makes you look like they are scared to take them on.



More UK (World) News click here
Follow The Earth Times
Subscribe to RSS Follow Earth Times on TwitterNews by email
Share/Save/Bookmark

 
 



 
Subscribe to free Earthtimes
News Alerts by Email Click here
For RSS Feeds Click here
or Create your own RSS

Add to Google Toolbar
Breaking News
Press Releases

 


The Earth Times
News Category

© 2009 www.earthtimes.org, The Earth Times, All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy
Earth Times accept no responsibility or liability either directly or indirectly for views or opinions expressed in articles or comments.