Africa | America | Asia | Australasia | Europe | India | Middle East | UK | US

Split decision on Alaska English-only law

Posted : Sun, 04 Nov 2007 04:25:21 GMT
Author : General News Editor
Category : US (World)
News Alerts by Email ( click here )
US World News | Home
JUNEAU, Alaska, Nov. 4 The Alaska Supreme Court has struck down parts of the state's English-only law in a split decision that both sides claim as a victory.

The high court said Friday that the first section of the law, which says English is the only language that can be used for government functions, is unconstitutional. In practice, that means Native Alaskan communities can continue to conduct meetings in their own languages, The Anchorage Daily News said.

The second part, which requires English for all government documents and records, is constitutional as long as duplicates can be made in other languages, the justices said. The decision was 4-1 with the dissenter urging that the entire law be declared void.

The law was passed by referendum in 1998. It has never been enforced because of the legal action brought by the Alaska Civil Liberties Union and three Native Alaskan groups -- the borough of Togiak, the North Slope Borough and the Native American Rights Fund.

Copyright 2007 by UPI

Share/Save/Bookmark

Article : Split decision on Alaska English-only law
Print this article
Email this article

Stay Updated
News gadget on your Google homepage
Subscribe to a news feed in Google Reader



Have your Say
Name
Email
Subject
Your Comment

Enter Verification code
 
  

 

 

More US (World) News click here
Follow The Earth Times
Subscribe to RSS Follow Earth Times on TwitterNews by email
Share/Save/Bookmark

 
 



 
Subscribe to free Earthtimes
News Alerts by Email Click here
For RSS Feeds Click here
or Create your own RSS

Add to Google Toolbar
Breaking News
Press Releases


The Earth Times
News Category

© 2009 www.earthtimes.org, The Earth Times, All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy
Earth Times accept no responsibility or liability either directly or indirectly for views or opinions expressed in articles or comments.