Study: Italian chains pile on calories

Posted : Wed, 31 Oct 2007 21:43:21 GMT
Author : Health News Editor
Category : Health
News Alerts by Email ( click here )
Health News | Home
WASHINGTON, Oct. 31 Two popular U.S. chains of Italian restaurants serve dishes that are high in calories and saturated fat, an advocacy group said Wednesday.

The Center for Science in the Public Interest said it had independent lab tests done on dishes from Olive Garden and examined company data for Romano's Macaroni Grill.

"If you wanted to enjoy the health benefits of the traditional Mediterranean diet, you'd eat mostly fruits, vegetables, beans, whole grains and fish," said CSPI nutrition director Bonnie F. Liebman. "But the heaping portions of meat, cheese, pasta, and cream sauces served up at Italian-style American chain restaurants are about as far from the ideal Mediterranean diet as you can get."

A couple who ate at one of the chain restaurants -- splitting an order of calamari to begin and an order of tiramisu for dessert and ordering typical main courses -- would consume 2,800 calories and about three days worth of saturated fat in the one meal, the group said.

Details on the study and recommendations for eating health were published in CSPI's November Nutrition Action Healthletter.

Copyright 2007 by UPI

Share/Save/Bookmark

Article : Study: Italian chains pile on calories
Print this article
Email this article

Stay Updated
News gadget on your Google homepage
Subscribe to a news feed in Google Reader



Have your Say
Name
Email
Subject
Your Comment

Enter Verification code
 
  

 

 

More Health News click here
Follow The Earth Times
Subscribe to RSS Follow Earth Times on TwitterNews by email
Share/Save/Bookmark

 
 



 
Subscribe to free Earthtimes
News Alerts by Email Click here
For RSS Feeds Click here
or Create your own RSS

Add to Google Toolbar
Breaking News
Press Releases


The Earth Times
News Category

© 2009 www.earthtimes.org, The Earth Times, All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy
Earth Times accept no responsibility or liability either directly or indirectly for views or opinions expressed in articles or comments.