Zune a 'poor me-too' of iPod say disappointed users, reviewers
|
|
|
| Posted
:
Mon, 27 Nov 2006 12:20:00 GMT |
| By
:
Thomas Blythe |
| Category
:
Technology |
| News Alerts by
Email ( click
here ) |
|
Technology News |
Home
|
|
|
|
NEW YORK: Earlier this month Microsoft released its portable music player Zune hoping to compete against Apple's iPod. But market watchers, analysts and most of the first users are saying the product is a poor imitation of Apple's offering. We quote some users and experts: “a poor me-too”; a technological “folly”; Microsoft “botched it this time”; etc.
So what's a fair verdict? Will Microsoft's Zune eventually match or trump the iPod with better features or will it just trail behind the latter, which in any case has a head start? To be fair, Zune does have a couple of features that the iPod doesn't have, but are they enough to ensure good sales momentum?
What's different about Zune: it allows the user to 'squirt' (i.e. to share) a song with someone using another Zune within 10 meters. The person just has to accept the tune and the gadget will catch it in a few seconds. However, the recipient will be able to listen to it either only three times or keep it for three days, whichever comes first. After this the song will 'evaporate' or 'expire'.
It's a bit like peeking into another person's playlist to learn about their musical preferences based on which, one would draw up a mental picture of that person. It could even be used simply to share music with friends. This feature uses the built-in Wi-Fi which alerts the user every time another Zune is within range. The company believes the squirting feature of Zune is “a really good first step” and could likely include similar wireless features in later versions of the digital music player,
When asked about the 3-day limit for free listening, a Microsoft spokesperson said the restriction was based on the company's deal with record labels. The music industry continues to see any technological advance as a threat to its business. They fear it would encourage piracy.
The iPod and now Zune have greatly transformed the way people buy music. People no longer visit a brick-&-mortar store to check out CDs of their choice and then make a purchase. A significant percentage of music sales nowadays happens online. Apple's online music library iTunes has made it a lot simpler, allowing visitors to download songs of their choice for 99c a song or for a subscription fee as with Rhapsody.com which charges a monthly fee of $9.99 for unlimited access to music.
On the other hand, Zune's equivalent of iTunes, the Zune Marketplace (uses a currency of points), compels the user to shell out at least $5 which will buy a bulk of 400 points (@ 99 cents for ever 79 points). When your total purchase reaches $80 worth, you get one extra song free. The Zune Marketplace offers a choice of about 2 million tracks but no videos or podcasts.
While experts say that there may be room for more players in the market for digital music players, Microsoft's attempt clearly does not qualify. It is certainly not an “iPod killer” an analyst said. But Apple isn't likely to sit complacently either. Although Zune may not be regarded as competition, the company could soon include the WiFi feature in its own iPods.
Copyright,
respective author or news agency
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Iriver H300
By:
G ,
Tue, 05 Dec 2006 21:47:52 GMT
|
|
The iriver H300 is a great MP3 player. Great navigation, great battery life, and very user friendly when it comes to transfering music. It's plug and play, once you plug it in, it comes up as an external hard drive and you can drag music into it. No itunes or windows media player needed. Does Zune have that feature?
|
|
dumb...
By:
uci ,
Wed, 29 Nov 2006 05:10:24 GMT
|
|
you guys are all idiots for arguing. I hate to waste time reading your comments
|
|
O_<
By:
eM ,
Tue, 28 Nov 2006 17:21:08 GMT
|
|
Microsoft?
Give up already.
And go hide in a corner.
|
|
10,000,000 Zune critics can't be wrong
By:
Anonnymous ,
Tue, 28 Nov 2006 14:36:26 GMT
|
|
I played with a Zune this weekend, and in conclusion, I rather get an iPod this Christmas. An iPod killer is supposed to address the things people complain about the iPod (battery life, music restrictions, price), the Zune addresses none. About the wireless feature... seriously, who cares? It looks to me like a gimmick thrown in because they can't match the iPod in the stuff that matters.
|
|
Zune and Wireless music swapping
By:
IPTV Evangelist ,
Mon, 27 Nov 2006 22:18:56 GMT
|
|
The wireless aspect of this device could be a killer innovation over the ipod and that Microsoft was not able to cut the appropriate deal with the RIAA is a shame.
I have for some time envisioned the ability where users of a music/video music service could share content between one another, this on a paid tiered system. For example; users at the “Platinum” level would be able to share content with a member of their “friends” circle who also has the same paid level of service. If you have a great cut of Stereophonics and I have one of Guster, we could swap with one another. DBMS and DRM systems are sophisticated enough that you could track who has swapped content and if revenue streams can be derived from both the sales of songs and the service there should be enough financial incentive for both the record industry and Microsoft to be interested.
|
|
Astroturfing at it's finest
By:
jake ,
Mon, 27 Nov 2006 21:25:37 GMT
|
|
Boy the MS astroturf minions are everywhere. Some of these comments are carbon copies of others on sites critical of the "zune".
|
|
Zune
By:
pd ,
Mon, 27 Nov 2006 18:36:14 GMT
|
|
I have three Macs in the house, and I still bought the Zune. I have to boot into Windows to use it, but I consider it worth the hassle to be rid of the iPod I returned.
The interface is excellent, and quite honestly I hated the touch weel. It was nifty at first, but in use I found it archaic and cumbersome.
I simply don't understand some folks devotion to branding. If a product is good I buy it, and the Zune is quite good.
|
|
WTF? Why the loyalty?
By:
Billy Ash ,
Mon, 27 Nov 2006 18:30:02 GMT
|
|
What I can't understand is why so many people feel the need to take sides. Why does it have to be Zune or the iPod? Surely it should come down to what is the best product?
Surely as collective consumers, it pays for us to be impartial, and buy whichever product is the best.
At the moment, the iPod is the best product...by far. So it's really silly to delude yourself to say that the iPod is rubbish or stupid. Look, if having a device that can squirt (just sounds icky) music to another device is important to you, then go with the Zune. Even tho you cannot use that music after 3 days.
The deal is, if Microsoft up the ante, and if Apple get lazy, then maybe Zune 2.0 will be worth buying. Kinda like what is happening with the X-box-PS3 shebango.
My personal prediction is that Apple will release some superb products next year, putting the iPod well ahead of the pack (again).
|
|
My next DAP (DAP???) WILL be an iPod, as will the one after that...
By:
Steve too ,
Mon, 27 Nov 2006 15:59:22 GMT
|
|
Tossing around jargon like DAP makes you sound like an industry insider, not a typical consumer. (You wouldn't happen to work for Microsoft, would you?) Everyone I know, myself included, loves their iPods. I got my second-generation three years ago when Apple came out with the third-gen, and it's been working flawlessly ever since. True, the battery life is not what it once was, and the screen and chrome have a bit of scratching after three years, but not so that it hinders my viewing or dampens my enthusiasm for it.
|
|
click wheel!
By:
Cypy ,
Mon, 27 Nov 2006 15:24:46 GMT
|
|
Steve made a comment about the iPod click wheel being inferior to the Zune's controls. How in the world is pressing a button over and over again to navigate up in down menus easier than scrolling your thumb around a smooth surface? That makes no since!
If microsoft wanted to make an easy to use interface, they could've at least shelled out enough cash to have a click wheel!
|
|
what a load of c**p
By:
sean ,
Mon, 27 Nov 2006 14:37:05 GMT
|
|
I just don't understand those MSFT haters. Are you telling any piece of truth? Zune is a great product. It will dominate in a short time. Apple is a stupid loser. iPod? what a stupid name.
Stop embrassing yourself, people.
|
|
'Zune Points'?
By:
Jim ,
Mon, 27 Nov 2006 14:10:06 GMT
|
|
Sounds like Itchy & Scratchy Money to me.
|
|
My next DAP won’t be an iPod.
By:
Steve ,
Mon, 27 Nov 2006 13:42:51 GMT
|
|
Poor article from a writer that obviously knows little about this technology or its players. The article is hearsay and full of half truthts at best.
Microsoft never said it was going to release an iPod Liller, the press did. MS said Zune was the first of a line of WiFi products designed to support the multi billion dollar WiFi network they are creating nation wide.
Apples invention? That’s just not true. Creative Labs nto only invented it, but owns the patent and has been awarded royalties FROM Apple for the DAP invention and menu. I owned a Creative Nomad YEARS before Apple even dreamed about the iPod.
My next DAP won’t be an iPod. Myself and too many others I know have had way too many problems with their iPods. Between battery life dwindling, issues with displays and downright breaking, its become more of a nuisance. Several other friends have the Creative Zen and have quite literally tossed it around, scuffed up its body and have not once had it break. My next player will either be a Creative Zen or a Zune, the iPod is too trendy and the body is prone to scratching and damage.
I played with a Zune this holiday weekend and was very impressed with it. Awesome screen, wonderful display window and the navigation controls are much easier to use then the overly sensitive click wheel.
Maybe this reviewer should have actually gotten their hands on the product they were reviewing instead of just regurgitating other reviewers comments.
|
|
|
|
|