Circumcision in boys may help prevent STDs

Posted : Tue, 07 Nov 2006 16:36:00 GMT
By : Roland Waite
Category : Health
News Alerts by Email ( click here )
Health News | Home
The report of a 25 year New Zealand study, published in the November issue of the international journal Pediatry, suggests that neo-natal circumcision may reduce the risk of STDs by upto 50%.

The latest study conducted on 510 boys, teens and young men from birth to the age of 25, shows that 356 uncircumcised boys had a 2.66 fold increased risk of contracting STDs in contrast to 154 circumcised boys.

The authors of this study, Dr David M Fergusson and colleagues, suggest that had neonatal circumcisfion taken place, the rate of approximately 48% of STDs found in subjects in the study, could have been prevented.

They analysed data collected for the Christchurch Health and Development Study.

The subjects were divided into 2 groups based on whether they were circumcised before the age of 15 or not. Contraction of STDs between the ages of 18 and 25 was determined by a questionnaire.

Though the results show that circumcision can reduce the risk of STDs like HIV, syphilis and genital ulcers by upto 50%, results are more mixed for other STDs.

The American Academy of Pediatrics has labeled the findings as “complex and conflicting”. However, Jay Berkelhamer, president of the Academy thinks that its time to reconsider the evidence in light of the new study.

Although the results are considered inconclusive due to insufficient evidence, the authors insist that, “The public health issues raised by these findings clearly involve weighing the longer-term benefits of routine neonatal circumcision in terms of reducing risks of infection within the population, against the perceived costs of the procedure."

Copyright, respective author or news agency

Share/Save/Bookmark

Article : Circumcision in boys may help prevent STDs
Print this article
Email this article

Stay Updated
News gadget on your Google homepage
Subscribe to a news feed in Google Reader


Related News

Have your Say
Name
Email
Subject
Your Comment

Enter Verification code
 
  

 

 
Your Comments

insufficient evidence
By: Dustin , Fri, 17 Nov 2006 19:43:04 GMT

What garbage. Another "study" that just wasted probably millions of dollars for "results are considered inconclusive due to insufficient evidence". So it means nothing. The only way to be sure to not get an STD is to not have sex... or have you're potential sex partner get tested beforehand. Good luck with that.


Bogus conclusion.
By: Sarah , Fri, 10 Nov 2006 22:37:42 GMT

How do boys get STD's? Step one- sleep with an uncircumcised woman carrying a STD...

How come the researchers don't frame their findings with information about almost universal lack of circumcision among the STD carrying females?


Invalid science aside, circumcision violates rights
By: RB , Fri, 10 Nov 2006 01:30:39 GMT

If circumcising girls reduces STD's, it would still be an unacceptable outrage.

If circumcising boys reduces STD's, it's no less a violation of their right to intact genitals.

That said, this is very poor science. It's extremely difficult to do a valid study, because selection cannot be random, nor can subjects be unaware of their status.

Furthermore, I challenge anyone to show that they truly factored out even the obvious confounds. For example, they say they accounted for number of sexual partners and condom use.

Did they factor out how much intercourse (actual number of minutes) was had between the two groups?
For many reasons, the uncircumcised may may just be having more/longer sex. One reason is that a missing foreskin causes loss of lubrication, and thus potential discomfort and shorter sex. Also, a British study found women enjoyed sex with an intact partner more, which could obviously lead to longer intercourse.


circumcision
By: shantanu chakraborty , Thu, 09 Nov 2006 11:20:24 GMT

circumcision helps to prevent STD has been proved false...in 1970's ....Now again it is proved to be false from studies conducted by UN, USA and european countries in Africa....Thats why they stopped all fundings for male circ over there from this year...


Circumsition in boys
By: Paprita Pappas , Wed, 08 Nov 2006 15:43:54 GMT

I think all boys should be circumsized. I definitly agree on the fact the it could possibly prevent any possible diseases.



More Health News click here
Follow The Earth Times
Subscribe to RSS Follow Earth Times on TwitterNews by email
Share/Save/Bookmark

 
 



 
Subscribe to free Earthtimes
News Alerts by Email Click here
For RSS Feeds Click here
or Create your own RSS

Add to Google Toolbar
Breaking News
Press Releases

 


The Earth Times
News Category

© 2009 www.earthtimes.org, The Earth Times, All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy
Earth Times accept no responsibility or liability either directly or indirectly for views or opinions expressed in articles or comments.