Stern report assesses economic impact of climate change

While the catastrophic outcome of global warming and climate change are well known and deliberated the world over, a detailed attempt to measure its impact in terms of resources has been made for the first time by the former World Bank economist Nicholas Stern, in his 700-page report to the British government Monday. The wildfires, rising oceans, hurricanes and melting glaciers apart, Stern says global warming will eventually cost countries  from 5 per cent to 20 per cent of their gross domestic product.
Posted : Fri, 03 Nov 2006 11:48:00 GMT
By : Geoffrey Lewis
Category : Environment
News Alerts by Email ( click here )
Environment News | Home
LONDON: While the catastrophic outcome of global warming and climate change are well known and deliberated the world over, a detailed attempt to measure its impact in terms of resources has been made for the first time by the former World Bank economist Nicholas Stern, in his 700-page report to the British government Monday. The wildfires, rising oceans, hurricanes and melting glaciers apart, Stern says global warming will eventually cost countries from 5 per cent to 20 per cent of their gross domestic product.

He implores world governments to initiate strong action immediately saying there could be unprecedented flooding, famine and drought and resulting crop failures, drinking water shortage and increased incidence of certain diseases that can result in a worst-ever depression. He also portends a chaotic situation resulting from people in the affected countries migrating to lesser affected regions.

What is required now to arrest the slide and avoid much of the catastrophe, says Stern, is just 1 per cent of the GDP of the nations, which needs to be invested in programs to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

While some environmental experts contest the argument, the message cannot be ignored. The damage that will be caused if emissions are not significantly reduced will be irreversible in the long term.

Stern has warned that the effects of warming could create an equivalent of the depression of the 1920s.

The report talks about the results of the unplanned experiment that humankind is conducting with its habitat -- droughts, floods, famines, killer storms and worst of all higher prevalence of diseases. Developing countries will be the worst hit, but no region can escape, he warns.

He says while the climate change left unchecked could reduce the global economic activity by 20 per cent, changes that can be brought about in transportation, power production and other energy uses that are needed to avoid this disaster will reduce global economic growth by just 1 per cent only a year. Stern feels that if nothing is done there could be a great loss of jobs.

This pricks a big hole in the argument of President George Bush who has rejected any tax or cap on the principal greenhouse gas, carbon dioxide, contending it will lead to unemployment and deceleration in the economy's growth.

It has been estimated the emissions in the U.S. has gone up almost 16 per cent since 1990 and is on the rise every year. Britain has reduced emissions during that time by 14 per cent and Germany by 17 per cent.

Copyright, respective author or news agency

Share/Save/Bookmark

Article : Stern report assesses economic impact of climate change
Print this article
Email this article

Stay Updated
News gadget on your Google homepage
Subscribe to a news feed in Google Reader


Related News



    Have your Say
    Name
    Email
    Subject
    Your Comment

    Enter Verification code
     
      


     
    Your Comments

    Affording Less Stern Solutions to Climate Change
    By: Russ George , Sun, 05 Nov 2006 16:46:33 GMT

    Here's an illustration of how the global warming environmental apocalypse doesn't mean we need to risk an economic apocalypse.

    I keep getting asked whether I think buying a hybrid car or choosing some other techno option to reduce ones carbon footprint is a good thing to do. Of course it's good to reduce our use of energy and cut down some of the CO2 we are pouring into the global air. But let’s look at why we might choose to buy a hybrid car. Presumably the primary reason is because it's a "green car" and this helps save the planet. The hybrid burns about 1/2 the fuel of a comparable regular gas guzzler and so it emits about 1/2 the CO2. In the case of a Toyota Camry Hybrid vs. Camry Gas Guzzler the reduction in the CO2 emission for the hybrid version is about 2-3 tons of CO2 per year. That's great but to reach that reduction you have to pay about $6000 up front to Toyota. You get the added benefit of reduced fuel cost that makes up for this $6000 over many years if you keep the car that long. OK so all this is wonderful and helps the planet. But can less money do more is the question.

    Here is my take on the story. Consider the added cost of a hybrid averaged over 5 years and provides a 50% reduced carbon footprint which means the cost of that footprint reduction is about $1200 per year (over five years). The cost of achieving the same carbon footprint reduction via Planktos ecorestoration of trees and seas is about $10-$15 per year (2 or 3 tons X $5). Go to www.planktos.com/store and you can do it now. That's a mighty big difference, a factor of about 1000 times. So for the same money paid to Toyota Corporation for a great hybrid car a person could erase the carbon footprint of a lifetime of cars, homes, and airplane flights via ecorestoration. We think that is a compelling reason why people should look first to our ecorestoration option. OK, if you still just have to have one of those cute hybrids, by all means do so too!

    That factor of 1000X in cost is why the world is talking about the potential economic apocalypse that we risk if we act to solve the impending environmental apocalypse. Take for example the figures that came out this week from the UK saying the world needs to spend $7 trillion to redress rising CO2 in the air. That $7 trillion is the number you come up with if you use Toyota's hybrid price tag as the index on the cost of action... the ecorestoration price tag provides a more affordable global solution and better results at a mere $7 billion. That’s a number we can all afford to restore our planetary gardens, and we then get to live there.

    To listen to a talk radio show on this topic visit our streaming radio link at http://www.planktos.com/audio/kgo-interview-31oct06.m3u

    Russ George - President
    Planktos Inc.
    1151 Triton Dr. Suite C
    Foster City, CA 94404 (San Francisco)



    More Environment News click here
    Follow The Earth Times
    Subscribe to RSS Follow Earth Times on TwitterNews by email
    Share/Save/Bookmark

     
     



     
    Subscribe to free Earthtimes
    News Alerts by Email Click here
    For RSS Feeds Click here
    or Create your own RSS

    Add to Google Toolbar
    Breaking News
    Press Releases

     

    Based on the mercury content of these fish sticks...
     

    The Earth Times
    News Category

    © 2010 www.earthtimes.org, The Earth Times, All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy
    Earth Times accept no responsibility or liability either directly or indirectly for views or opinions expressed in articles or comments.