CANBERRA--Australian
environmentalists and politicians have condemned
US President George W. Bush’s recent decision
to abandon an international treaty on global warming
The
Australian Senate recently passed a motion, moved by
Greens Senator Bob Brown, condemning both the US administration
and the Australian government of Prime Minister John
Howard for their failure to support the Kyoto Protocol.
The accord, signed in 1997, calls upon industrialized
countries to reduce their emissions of greenhouse gases--predominantly
carbon dioxide from burning of fossil fuels--by 5.2
percent below 1990 levels by 2012.
“It’s the most powerful message
that can be sent to a foreign government from
Australia other than from the Australian government
itself,” Senator Brown said.
The Australian Democrats also joined in and
called on the Howard government to assure the
Parliament that Australia would not follow
the US, but instead look to the UK, Europe
and New Zealand in pursuing a climate change
treaty independent of the Bush administration.
“Australia’s poor reputation as
the highest per capita emitter in the world
and our economic vulnerability to climate change
means we have a lot to lose by taking the US
line,” Democrats leader Senator Meg Lees
argued in Parliament.
A recent report released by the Intergovernmental
Panel on Climate Change indicates that global
warming will have an increasing impact on human
and natural systems in Australia as the frequency
and severity of extreme weather conditions
increase. This is expected to have a negative
impact on the farming, tourism, agriculture,
coastal development, and other economic sectors.
The change of climate could also bring about
the destruction of the Great Barrier Reef within
the next 50 years, the report adds.
Although the US is the largest overall producer
of greenhouse gas emissions, Australia is considered
the highest producer per capita, with each
person causing the equivalent of 26.7 tons
of carbon dioxide to be released into the atmosphere
a year.
Under the Kyoto agreement, Austrialia due
to its heavy reliance on fossil fuels was allowed
to limit its greenhouse gas emissions to 8
percent above its 1990s levels.
Although the
Australian Environment Minister, Robert Hill,
has expressed Australia’s
commitment to achieving the targets set out
at Kyoto, he has said that the protocol will
collapse without the support of the United
States.
“Well, I don’t think you can have
the Kyoto protocol without the United States…If
the United States walks away from that then
I think it is dead,” the environment
minister told the Australian press.
Minister Hill is to visit the US in the coming
weeks with the hopes of lobbying the Bush administration
to reconsider, but his calls will most likely
fall upon deaf ears.
The Australian
government has for the time being agreed
to continue to meet the commitments
it made at Kyoto, but has backed the US’s
position on the need for developing countries
to combat global warning.
“We are continuing with our program
to reduce them [greenhouse gas emissions] in
Australia, but we also recognize, as the United
States administration does, that you can’t
have a comprehensive world-wide agreement on
greenhouse gas emissions unless you get the
developing countries involved,” Prime
Minister John Howard said in an Australian
radio interview.
Not so, said
Gareth Walton, a climate campaigner with
Greenpeace Australia. “The developing
country argument is a smokescreen for countries
to avoid their responsibilities.
“Developing countries have agreed to
join the Protocol once developed countries,
which are responsible for 80 percent of greenhouse
gas emissions, take action first,” the
environmentalist added.
The Australian government has yet to officially
announce if it will also decide not to ratify
the treaty.
For the protocol to come into force, it must
be ratified by 55 nations. To date, 84 countries
have signed the international treaty, but only
33 have ratified it.
“If the Australian government wants
to display positive leadership on this issue,
it should join the EU, Japan and New Zealand
in committing to ratify by 2002, rather than
trying to get the US back on board the climate
talks so together they can weaken the Protocol,” Walton
said.
|